Week 3

50 people who could save the planet.

First of all, I think that the title of the article is wrong. Even though it is catchy, the title make up believe that the planet needs to be saved from something. Maybe saved from humans. I don’t think that humans have to ability to destroy the plant, but humans can destroy their ability to live on the planet. The title should be 50 people who can save humans ability to live on earth. The earth will always be here, even if human change the environment.
If I had to pick a person from this paper who I thought could make a difference, it would be 12 year Madhav Subrmanian from India. If a 12 year old child is interested in saving a child and has enough initiative to start a foundation called “Kids for Tiger”, imagine what he can do when he is older.
If children start to understand humans affect on the environment at a young age, they will not do what previous generations have done, such as burning fossil fuels, Deforestation etc. The next generation is the key for our survival. They will be more conscience of the activities and will be living a sustainable lifestyle that our generation has not been able to do.